![]() ![]() Ensure Effective Congressional OversightĪll relevant committees, including the Armed Services, Foreign Relations and Foreign Affairs, Intelligence and Judiciary Committees, should be able to engage in meaningful oversight, and the administration should work cooperatively with these committees. Disclose the legal criteria for identification of targets, including for placement on so-called “kill lists” and for subsequent targeting, and criteria for so-called “personality strikes,” “signature strikes” or Terrorist Attack Disruption Strikes (TADS).Release to the public the counterterrorism manual reported to exist by the Washington Poston Janu(with minimal redactions to protect legitimately secret information) and.Release to the public all Department of Justice, Central Intelligence Agency and Department of Defense memoranda that reflect the administration’s interpretation of operative law and policy concerning the lethal targeting of any person.In particular, we urge the administration to: In fact, improved transparency may serve national security by demonstrating the legal bases for targeted killing policies and practices. We are confident it is possible to improve transparency without putting intelligence sources at risk or endangering genuine national security interests. legal and policy standards will leave the administration vulnerable to challenges to the sincerity of its commitment to transparency and the rule of law. government to make good on the President’s stated commitment to greater transparency on this crucial issue. lethal targeting practices are made “more transparent to the American people and to the world.” We urge the U.S. President Obama acknowledged the need to lift the veil of secrecy on targeted killings in his most recent State of the Union address, during which he pledged to ensure that U.S. public, policymakers charged with conducting oversight, and the international community. Greater disclosure of legal and policy standards, and procedural mechanisms, is a necessary prerequisite to informed assessment and debate by the U.S. Ĭommitment to the rule of law requires that the administration disclose the legal constraints on its lethal targeting operations. lethal force operations abroad comply with international law enable meaningful congressional oversight and judicial review and ensure effective investigations, tracking and response to civilian harm. In particular, we call on the administration to: publicly disclose key targeted killing standards and criteria ensure that U.S. targeted killing policies and practices, particularly those outside the internationally-recognized armed conflict in Afghanistan. The undersigned human rights and civil rights groups urge the United States to take essential steps to ensure meaningful transparency and legal compliance with regard to U.S. STATEMENT OF SHARED CONCERNS REGARDING U.S. Human Rights Institute, Columbia Law School lethal force operations abroad comply with international law enable meaningful congressional oversight and judicial review and ensure effective investigations, tracking and response to civilian harm.Ĭenter for Human Rights & Global Justice, NYU School of Law Our statement, attached, urges the administration to take essential steps to: publicly disclose key targeted killing standards and criteria ensure that U.S. The undersigned human rights and civil rights groups write to convey a statement of shared concerns regarding U.S. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |